7.31.2008

No audio of the speech today, so the merits must be weighed on the sense of the words and sentiments.
In my earliest knowledge of Wilson, I remember feeling badly that the man had worked so diligently on the League only to be thwarted by his homeland in its failure to ratify the document, later this feeling of sympathy gave way to a sense that Wilson must have been out of touch with the country - and thus not a very good president. Still, might not a president be called upon to set aside the immediate desires of his country in order to choose a course that will better benefit them in the long run.

The world had just come through the horror of trench warfare - an entire generation lost. It is tempting to muse what might have happened had the world really thrown it's weight behind the League of Nations, particularly when in the penultimate paragraph he speaks of a power using land for it's European purposes. He is obviously talking about colonialism, but one's mind quickly jumps to Hitler's lebensraum. Would that progression have been stopped had the world truly formed a league of peace, willing to get involved in the matters because the concord of the world was at stake? When Wilson called the document a guranty against things which nearly brought civilization to ruin, could he even have imagined the destruction of the atom bomb or the fear of MAD?

Who knows? It's a fruitless question, and the answer is probably not. I don't think any country was willing to sacrifice its interests for the sake of the league of peace - how much use could it be if you'd already fought the war to end all wars. The situation reminds that some sacrifice is required in order to reach larger purposes. This lesson however, seems perpetually hard to learn. Even as the developed nations are calling for alternatives fuels and reduced emissions, India is seeking to develop a national car affordable for its citizens. The argument is put in print that those nations think they should have the same opportunity as their developed cousins - still all humans know that it's best to learn from the mistakes of others if you can, sometimes that means giving up what we want to gain what is better.

What else could Wilson have imagined? Coule he have thought that there would come a day when things would be instantly publishable?

We may not always get it right, but surely it's something if we keep trying to improve. The league of nations is not an obsolete idea, nor the United Nations an antiquated body if we choose for them not to be. Who can really argue with a league dedicated to the peace of the world?

Wilson's optimism shines through in his speech, and as in previous speeches there has been a call to become something better and more noble than what we are currently - and I think this is what endures in these speeches, the challenge to become what we believe we could be.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

If this speech were a textbook, it would have stayed on my shelf mostly unopened. Maybe I am just too cynical this morning or maybe I am having difficulty trying to imagine how these words would sit with you in the time when they were delivered; before the failure of the League, before another world war, before the ineffectiveness I have seen in the United Nations from the Korean Conflict to Darfur. Washington was right in his farewell address when he said “beware of foreign entanglements”.

I had a tough time knowing where to start with this. As you may have noticed from the first paragraph, this is not one of my favorites; I have never been a big fan of Wilson, which is strange since I find the time period of WWI and the roaring 20’s an important and interesting one.

First, you are right. Striving to improve the situation seems to be a familiar theme in the speeches so far and as that is a noble undertaking, I expect we will see more of that. I don’t find the words to be that compelling and in general peace pacts are pretty ineffective; from the Concert of Europe through the Geneva Convention up to and including the UN. I think that Wilson was sincere but I don’t think U.S. involvement would have saved the organization. The League was merely another failed part of the Treaty of Versailles. I do think it was interesting that they were talking about the rights of working people, the difficulties of sanctions, and what to do if sanctions don’t work. We still don’t have the answers.

I told Jimmy the other day that I had found something worthwhile in each speech so far. I was worried about this one. However in chasing a rabbit trail for this comment, I did find a quote from Benito Mussolini. Italy was one of the Great Powers referred to early in Wilson’s address and you rarely see anything Italian quoted except “that’s amore”. I leave you for today with this from Il Duce: “The League is very well when sparrows shout, but no good at all when eagles fall out.”

Sara said...

Good thoughts - and good find on the Mussolini quote.