7.30.2008

Lady Bird wore black:
His mouth is drawn tight, the chamber subdued and in dark clothing, it is 5 days past Kennedy's assination, and what on earth can anyone say?

This speech is both a mourning and call. It is perhaps impossible to listen to in the same trust of government that accompanied that time before Vietnam, and Watergate and all the rest of it. It is difficult to hear Johnson speak of peace while knowing that a war that would rend the American fabric was brewing in Asia.

But on that day, it was still in the future, and the nation had suffered a "profound shock."

While hearing Johnson speak of what would later become his sweeping social reforms, it begs of the question of how much of that is Kennedy's own dream, and how much Johnson. I've read in an article from a Johnson aide, that those were more his issues than his predeccesor's.

It is clear that he is more comfortable a member of the senate fraternity, than burdened with the presidency. And he is most compelling when he acknowledges that in the office he did not seek, and which was thrust upon him by cruel fate, he is in need of the help of all Americans.

Some of what he said is much like what President Bush has said - that we will be loyal to our friends, but foes to those who would impose the tyranny of terror.

Once he reaches the phrase "Let us continue," the speech shifts in tone to a call to action.

From accent to sentiment he is unmistakeably Texan - there is no doubt in my mind that when he utters the phrase "I promise..." he means it to his very core. His name is his word, he is loyal to allies and friends, earnest in knowing and acting right - these are creeds that I also know to my very core and it is my own knowledge that recognizes it in him. In the Texas where I was young, we wore our boots and waved our flags, learning early that the word Texas meant friend, learning early that to betray a friend was an unimaginable act, that to promise something was to put your name and honor on the line. Though in our post-Vietnam country, it is hard to hear or hold these things without seeming or being judged naive, and I don't know how many people still do.

His call for all Americans to respect and understand one another, his call to end the teaching and preaching of hate and violence, his call to turn from fanatics and bigots and other poisoners remains inspiring and lifting today.

And though he may have felt more comfortable on the other side of the speakers podium, when he invokes Lincoln, calling the body to "highly resolve," that Kennedy "shall not have lived or died in vain," it is clear that he is mantling the Presidency - having given his word, what else could he do?

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I doubt if I heard this speech in its entirety at the time it was given. I must have been home for Thanksgiving vacation and we were probably doing all those salads that Mom used to fix. I think that your brother is right, not all of the speeches on this list are great in their words or their delivery so their importance must derive from the event they memorialize.

Just as 9/11 will always be the milestone in your freshman year at Mizzou, November 22, 1963 is mine. That day marked a change from “bubble-gum music to hard rock” – like “American Pie”, it was the day the music died and the first time we had constant news coverage of a news event. I think the stations kept broadcasting all night (normally, the stations signed off the air after the late movie) and straight through the funeral. The assassination happened on Friday, the funeral was held on Monday and then on Wednesday everybody went home for break.

The thing was, nobody knew what to expect or what was going to happen next. How could this happen in the United States? Would more government leaders be targeted? Who had done this? Was it the communists? Was it Lyndon Johnson? Would we wake up tomorrow under attack? Would the government hold? Would the economy be okay? Probably the seriousness of some of these questions was enhanced by the normal freshman-in-college political/philosophical/moral discussions over coffee in the Union or beer at Cosmos.

At any rate, LBJ went to Congress to soothe the rational and the irrational fears of the country. In listening and watching this clip, I noticed that Congress looks remarkably white and male – maybe the “times were a changing”. Personally, I love that Texas twang but the East Coast crowd didn’t like it then any more than now. I guess that no Texas politician can say Vietnam without making it three syllables. He might have been doing a little revisionist history, as I recall, LBJ was the one who was always pushing the civil rights legislation. Kennedy called for it but I think it always rested on LBJ to push it through.

This speech strikes me as a combo, part eulogy and part interim State of the Union.
I do think he turned a couple of good phrases – the courage to seek peace and the fortitude to risk war; …derive strength not weakness and wisdom not despair from our differences…In that time we didn’t feel so compelled to always find agreement and march in lockstep to one tune, but we did seem to come together to accomplish some things
I think these are forceful and positive positions like the ones Reagan later took acting and negotiating from positions of strength not sitting in the corner hoping things will work out.

Sara said...

Right on, Momma, thanks for placing the speech in historical context for me - reading more about that time and place helps me understand it better.

Anonymous said...

I have to say one more time, I think you have an amazing gift with words. You paint an amazing picture and touch my heart. I would read your column everyday.

Anonymous said...

"...we must recognize the obligation to match national strength with national restraint"

He said this about nine months (11-27-63, 8-2-1964) before the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. Kind of mkes you puke in your mouth a little, particularly after seeing the Vietnam Memorial. It was a good speech for the moment. I am further convinced that many of these speeches are on the list because of the topic, not because they are written or given well. As for civil rights, one of the biggest breakthroughs in civil rights happened 60 years ago this week - the integration of the Armed Services. There was a big deal at the Truman Library about it because Truman did it. Why doesn't anyone ever mention Harry S. Truman when talking about civil rights? The first civil rights bill was his, the integration of the military was his, but all people talk about is MLK Jr and Johnson.

Sara said...

Well pointed out, Jim - I had the same thoughts about why Truman isn't more remembered for this.